Creditworthiness Verifications and PPP Loans

CPA firms receiving requests from lenders for creditworthiness verifications for clients who had requested Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loans were often unsure of how to respond. The advice CAMICO gave CPAs assisting their clients with PPP loan applications is valid for similar circumstances in which a lender wishes the borrower’s CPA to provide creditworthiness feedback to the lender.

Many lenders, in response to economic challenges precipitated by the pandemic, stated they needed borrowers' accountants to sign financial statements supporting borrower loan applications. Government regulations did not require this step. CAMICO has historically cautioned accountants not to accommodate such requests. Accommodating these requests is not required and could violate professional standards were the accountant to provide assurances regarding a borrower’s solvency or ability to repay the debt.

CAMICO discourages accountants from communicating directly with lenders. If the accountant were to choose to do so, then CAMICO offers its policyholders wording to specify the services performed, point out those services did not contemplate accommodating their request, and indicate the lender would need to rely on its own underwriting procedures. Prior to the issuance of Statement on Standards for Accounting and Review Services (SSARS) No. 21 in October 2014, accountants were required to perform a compilation of financial statements engagement when they chose to accommodate lenders’ requests for financial statements. AR-C Section 70 of SSARS No. 21 introduced the preparation of financial statement engagement. CPAs whose license does not permit them to compile financial statements are not prohibited from performing preparation of financial statement engagements. Accountants who perform this service typically do not issue a report and instead prepare financial statements with a legend appearing on each page which clearly states no assurance is provided.

However, accountants may issue a disclaimer report when engaged to perform a preparation of financial statements. CAMICO has steadfastly discouraged accountants from using the disclaimer report option, as doing so would eliminate the anonymity associated with the typical "legend" approach, which does not require a disclaimer.

AR-C 70 mandates each page of prepared financial statements and related disclosures include a statement indicating no assurance is provided. AR-C 70 does not prescribe specific language. CAMICO recommends practitioners use the legend "No CPA provides any assurance on these financial statements", so financial statement readers aware of the CPA's association with the financial statements don’t mistakenly interpret the abbreviated "no assurance is provided" to mean the client isn’t providing assurance, but presume the CPA is providing assurance.

The scenario when lenders request financial statements signed by the accountant is the exception that defines the rule regarding disclaimers. If the lender insists on receiving a "financial statement signed by the borrower's accountant," instead of performing a compilation engagement, CPAs can accommodate the request by performing a preparation engagement and issuing a disclaimer report. CPAs choosing this path will need to obtain a signed engagement letter detailing the client’s and accountant's mutual responsibilities. Neither the compilation report nor the disclaimer report provides assurance, but the language in a disclaimer is concise, and if the firm is not already subject to peer review, the engagement would not subject the firm to peer review. When compelled to sign a report and a disclaimer is added, the "legend" is no longer required, but CAMICO encourages accountants to use the "belt and suspenders" approach and in addition to the disclaimer report, have each page of the financial statements and disclosures include the aforementioned "legend."

An illustrative disclaimer might read:

The accompanying financial statements of [entity] as of and for the year ended [date], were not subjected to an audit, review, or compilation engagement by [me/us], and [I/we] do not express an opinion or a conclusion, nor provide any assurance on them.

[Signature of [accounting firm/accountant]]
[Accountant’s city and state]
[Date]

To be clear, accountants may opt to perform a compilation engagement instead of performing a preparation engagement. However, accountants performing compilations will be subject to peer review, must issue a report (before SSARS No. 21, management use only compilations did not require a report), must consider whether they are independent and if NOT independent must specify in their compilation engagement letters and their compilation reports that they are not independent. CAMICO discourages CPAs from indicating why their independence is impaired, because were they to do so, AR-C 80 requires accountants to indicate in their report each reason their independence is impaired, and accountants could inadvertently omit a reason.



Share this post

Latest Articles

  • 08 Oct

    Disengaging to benefit your firm and the client

    The subject of disengaging is typically thought of as (at best) unpleasant, but disengaging can be a practice management tool that increases firm profitability and creates a better situation for both the CPA and the client.

    ... read more

  • 02 Aug

    Online Education Opportunities Offering Free CPE

    We're happy to announce that we are offering four new webcasts and will continue to record new risk management content over the next several months. In addition, we are offering a wide selection of self-study courses leased from Checkpoint Learning. And as a reminder, all of our CPE is ava... read more

  • 12 Jul

    Malpractice Risks Increase During Difficult Economic Times

    In CAMICO's 35 years of experience, economic conditions have had a significant impact on CPA professional liability claims. In light of the current economic challenges, now more than ever, CPAs will need to be prepared and vigilant to minimize the potential of additional liability exposure... read more